• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Lieff Ink

TELL YOUR STORY

  • About
  • Services
    • Writing • Editing
    • PR
    • Writing Tutor
  • Words
  • Press
  • Blog
  • Clients
    • Client List
    • Testimonials
  • Contact
  • Book
    • Accolades
    • Reviews

U2’s New Album: Free Music or Violating Free Will?

September 15, 2014

U2 Songs of InnocenceIt all started back in October 2007 when Radiohead decided to self-release In Rainbows as a download and told the world to pay what they thought it was worth. Next, during the last week of 2007, most countries saw the standard CD release followed by North America on January 1, 2008. In Rainbows was Radiohead’s first release after the end of their contract with EMI and the end of the longest gap between studio albums in their career. To say that this unprecedented move was a risk is an understatement but it paid off because upon its retail release In Rainbows entered the UK Albums Chart and the US Billboard 200 at number one. By October 2008, it had sold more than three million copies worldwide in both digital and physical formats. The album went on to earn widespread critical acclaim and was ranked as one of the best albums of 2007 by several publications. In 2009, it won two Grammy Awards for Best Alternative Music Album and Best Special Limited Edition Package.

In December 2013, Beyoncé shocked everyone in the music industry when she dropped a digital release of her fifth album Beyoncé without prior announcement or promotion. Her surprise move caused such a ruckus that it generated over 1.2 million tweets in 12 hours and unparalleled high praise from fans and the industry. One of my favorite writers, Rob Sheffield of Rolling Stone, said: “Beyoncé has delivered countless surprises in her 15 years on top of the music world, but she’s never dropped a bombshell like this. The Queen Bey woke the world in the midnight hour with a surprise ‘visual album’ – 14 new songs, 17 videos, dropped via iTunes with no warning. The whole project is a celebration of the Beyoncé Philosophy, which basically boils down to the fact that Beyoncé can do anything the hell she wants to.”

And that’s exactly right. When you put out quality music on your own terms the public will most likely respond well. Like In Rainbows, Beyoncé was a huge success as it debuted at number one on the Billboard 200, giving Beyoncé her fifth consecutive number one album, and sold 828,773 copies worldwide in three days, becoming the fastest-selling album in iTunes Store history. It spawned five singles and has sold 3.36 million units worldwide.

The latest unconventional move by a popular band/artist occurred last week when U2 announced and released their new album Songs of Innocence on iTunes for free for all iTunes users. I’m not even a U2 fan but poof! There it is in my library. Unfortunately for Apple and U2, this stunt has not been as well-received as the innovations by Radiohead and Beyoncé. Why? Because Apple pretty much pulled a Big Brother by inserting themselves and U2 into people’s music libraries without permission. Although it was meant to be a “gift” to all of Apple’s iTunes customers (500 million total worldwide) people didn’t appreciate the intrusion. Instead, what was supposed to be the “biggest album launch in history” has generated so many complaints that Apple had to figure out a quick method for people to delete the album if they don’t want it. Users are reminded that erasing the album means it will no longer show up in their “purchases” tab so if they want to re-download they will have to purchase it using their own dime. Additionally, Songs of Innocence will remain free until October 13 but after that, the album must be bought the regular way.

So what have we learned from these three very different but equally splashy promotions? While the public appreciates quality music from popular artists, they don’t want to feel like their right to choose has been taken away. Why didn’t U2 and Apple just create a button on iTunes that said something like “A U2 gift from us to you!” and let people decide to download the album on their own. That violation of free will, as ridiculous as it may sound to some, is important. Radiohead allowed fans to choose their own adventure by deciding how much the music was worth to them. Beyoncé simply decided to show everyone that this is her planet (and Jay-Z’s) and we just work here. Unfortunately U2’s gift felt more like we were getting music jammed down our throats and we had absolutely no choice in the matter. As a result, the band and the biggest company in the world are facing backlash rather than a celebration and it’s completely their fault.

Laura

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jena says

    September 15, 2014 at 3:10 pm

    I said the same thing. Why not get to choose via a little old button. I heard Miracle before this happened. Not super into it. Now, had they given me the Joshua Tree, there would’ve been no complaining….

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Blog Archive

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010

Footer

Laura Lieff was named Colorado Mountain College’s 2017-2018 Part Time Staff Member of the Year for her work as a writing tutor and teaching assistant.
Laura Lieff was named Colorado Mountain College’s 2017-2018 Part Time Staff Member of the Year for her work as a writing tutor and teaching assistant.

Work With Me

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
lieff-ink-logo_updated-2
  • About
  • Services
  • Words
  • Blog
  • Client List
  • Contact

Copyright © 2023 · PO Box 1228 Edwards CO 81632 · info@lauralieff.com