• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Lieff Ink

TELL YOUR STORY

  • About
  • Services
    • Writing • Editing
    • PR
    • Writing Tutor
  • Words
  • Press
  • Blog
  • Clients
    • Client List
    • Testimonials
  • Contact
  • Book
    • Accolades
    • Reviews

Ticketmaster = Scalpers

July 8, 2011

ticket scalperWhile it is common knowledge that Ticketmaster has made buying concert tickets one of the most frustrating processes this side of TSA taking over airport security (see my April 14 post), the City of Baltimore has brought up a new reason why their service fees are unacceptable.

Filed in the Northern Division of U.S. District Court in Maryland, Live Nation is now facing a class action lawsuit in Baltimore.  This lawsuit takes a new approach as it accuses Live Nation’s Ticketmaster division of being a scalper by charging above face value for tickets, which is against the law in the City of Baltimore.

What a genius move on Baltimore’s part!  Accusing Ticketmaster of being just like the sketchy guy who stands on the street corner in front of a venue with a cardboard sign is brilliant!

The lawsuit states that Ticketmaster “consistently and regularly sell tickets to events in Baltimore City at prices far exceeding the face value of those tickets” and that it “imposes and conspires to impose charges in addition to the face value of tickets denominated as ‘service charges,’ ‘convenience fees,’ ‘processing fees’ and other unlawful charges.”

It goes on to state that “because the Defendants sell tickets to Baltimore City events, they are acting as ‘ticket agencies’ under Baltimore City law – but none of the Defendants are licensed, as required, with Baltimore City.”

You tell ‘em Baltimore!

Here’s some more good stuff: “Even if the Defendants had been licensed ‘ticket agencies’…their activities described herein still would constitute wholesale violations of Baltimore City scalping laws.  These laws, designed to protect the public, are simply ignored by the Defendants, who dominate the ticket sales market for events in Baltimore City.”

The lawsuit was filed by Baltimore resident Andre Bourgeois, who bought tickets in 2009 to see Jackson Browne.  The tickets had a face value of $52 each but then Ticketmaster “allegedly” tacked on additional services charges of $12 per ticket, making the ticket price skyrocket 20 percent.

According to the lawsuit, since the city prohibits ticket agencies from adding convenience charges that are over $0.50 above face value, Ticketmaster broke the law as it routinely adds fees way over the allowed amount.

“The Defendants…have completely ignored the restrictions of Baltimore City law and have criminally overcharged their customers,” the lawsuit states. “They have reaped huge financial windfalls from operating outside of the rules which apply to them.”

The lawsuit is accusing Ticketmaster of the following: Money Had and Received, Negligent Misrepresentation, violation of the Maryland Consumer Protection Act, Deceit by Non- Disclosure or Concealment and violation of the federal Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).

I’m impressed with the persistence of both Mr. Bourgeois and the City of Baltimore.  They are not taking what Ticketmaster does lightly and are serious about making them pay.  And they should because Ticketmaster steals from the people (the music-loving public) who make them rich and it’s ridiculous.  Based on 2009 public finance reports, Ticketmaster generated over $1 billion in revenues as a result of the fees, which were charged on tickets worth a total of $8 billion.

“Defendants represented to Mr. Bourgeois that the additional service charges imposed on him were legitimate and collectible,” the lawsuit states. “Defendants did not disclose to Mr. Bourgeois that they were not licensed as ticket agencies by the Baltimore City Director of Finance. Defendants also did not disclose to Mr. Bourgeois that Defendants were prohibited by the Baltimore City Code from imposing and collecting the additional service charges which he paid.”

The lawsuit continues, “Despite full knowledge that Mr. Bourgeois and other Class members could not be legally charged for additional service charges, the Defendants willfully and knowingly charged Plaintiff and other members of the Class service charges in excess of the face value of each ticket they sold, as well as in excess of the $0.50 permissible service charges for licensed ticket agencies. Defendants pocketed these illegal service charges and refused to credit any portion of them to the ticket purchases of Plaintiff and members of the Class.”

Game on Ticketmaster.  What’s your next move?

Laura

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Nina says

    July 8, 2011 at 2:33 pm

    I can’t wait to see the outcome of this one! About time someone did something too – $12 per ticket in extra charges is insane!

    Reply
  2. Laura says

    July 8, 2011 at 3:40 pm

    I hope this lawsuit makes a difference. My concert-going schedule has diminished as a result of the extra fees and that really makes me mad. There are so many people out there who aren’t experiencing the live music they should because of Ticketmaster and something has to be done.

    Reply
  3. Mike Hardaker says

    July 10, 2011 at 12:26 am

    But wait aren’t Stubhub and Ticketmaster affiliated? For more music gossip check Colorado News. Great job on the site Laura!!

    Reply
  4. Laura says

    July 11, 2011 at 1:30 pm

    Thanks Mike – nice plug for your site as well 🙂

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Blog Archive

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010

Footer

Laura Lieff was named Colorado Mountain College’s 2017-2018 Part Time Staff Member of the Year for her work as a writing tutor and teaching assistant.
Laura Lieff was named Colorado Mountain College’s 2017-2018 Part Time Staff Member of the Year for her work as a writing tutor and teaching assistant.

Work With Me

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
lieff-ink-logo_updated-2
  • About
  • Services
  • Words
  • Blog
  • Client List
  • Contact

Copyright © 2023 · PO Box 1228 Edwards CO 81632 · info@lauralieff.com