• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Lieff Ink

TELL YOUR STORY

  • About
  • Services
    • Writing • Editing
    • PR
    • Writing Tutor
  • Words
  • Press
  • Blog
  • Clients
    • Client List
    • Testimonials
  • Contact
  • Book
    • Accolades
    • Reviews

Review: “Ten Arguments For Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now”

August 19, 2018

Written by Jaron Lanier, a scientist, musician, and bestselling writer, this book is abrasive literally from cover to cover. When you pick it up and see the title written in black and red capital letters, you might assume that you’re in for an opinionated read. You would be right. I read this book because we’re teaching it to our students next month along with Kate Fagan’s national bestseller What Made Maddy Run, both of which examine the effects of social media on our culture.

Lanier purposefully makes his stance clear in the title and he hammers his point home for 144 pages. Among many dramatic comparisons, he relates social media to addiction and says the founders of Facebook are partially responsible for behavior modification which “entails methodical techniques that change behavior patterns in animals and people.”

When he quotes Sean Parker, the first president of Facebook, it’s a bit alarming to read the drug reference and the blatant reasoning behind social media exploitation: “We need to sort of give you a little dopamine hit every once in a while, because someone liked or commented on a photo or post of whatever…you’re exploiting a vulnerability in human psychology…”

Chapter one is my favorite

The initial chapter of this book is definitely the most captivating because Lanier makes thought-provoking social and cultural points and has not yet introduced his annoyingly incessant acronym catchphrase called BUMMER which I’ll get to in second. For example, comparing social media users to dogs is both interesting and odd at the same time: “You are getting the equivalent of both treats and electric shocks when you use social media.” The author also makes an interesting point about the founders of online exploitation being those who invented digital gambling machines and websites.

Another reason chapter one is my favorite is because Lanier writes like a journalist (instead of a ranting author) by discussing both sides of the argument. He acknowledges that digital networks have value – especially in terms of efficiency and convenience. “Once you can use a pocket device to order rides and food and find out where to meet your friends right away, it’s hard to go back.” Amen. I couldn’t use my cell phone to make or receive calls for two days this week and it drove me crazy.

Tolerable until page 28

The beginning of chapter two is still thought-provoking because Lanier, unlike the journalists and psychologists who believe smartphones are the devil, rejects the argument that the smartphone is killing our society. Instead he blames social media. But he does add, “if you have good experiences with social media, nothing in this book invalidates those experiences.” Clearly Ten Arguments is for people who have been hurt by social media – in fact something significant must have happened to Lanier to prompt this brutal literary assault on such platform. He says, “smart people should delete their accounts until nontoxic varieties are available.” But will other varieties ever exist? Is that even possible? These same smart people should know that Facebook is a business. The creators got into it to make money and ending up changing the world.

Then on page 28 it all goes to hell when the author introduces the aforementioned annoying acronym. BUMMER = Behaviors of Users Modified, and Made into an Empire for Rent. Lanier uses this acronym constantly for the next 116 pages and it’s infuriating.

A few examples: “Much of the damage done by BUMMER can be undone by deleting your accounts, but the social loss of truth spills out from BUMMER and hurts even people who are not engaged directly with BUMMER at all.”

“BUMMER ruins our access to truth and meaning.”

“BUMMER algorithms must put you into categories and rank you in order to do anything BUMMER at all…The algorithms fundamentally work to favor platform owners and advertisers, and those parties need abstractions of you in order or manipulate you.”

And this goes on and on. For over 100 pages. The ranting gets so repetitive that while he’s trying to drive his point home he actually loses people.

Relevance

Throughout the next few chapters, Lanier does come up with a few gems. For example, of all the social networks, he considers LinkedIn to be the lesser of the evils. (He discloses that he has a professional association with the site but doesn’t have an account). Professional association or not, he makes a valid point about LinkedIn: “The difference is simply that users of LinkedIn have something to do other than compete for social appearances.” Very true. People are on the site to connect with others professionally – that’s why the word “connect” is used rather than “friend.”

On page 85 there is a mention of one of the major themes discussed in Maddy which is helpful for our class: “What bums me out is not some particular surface pattern – like seeing everyone else misrepresent their lives as being more wealthy, happy, and trouble-free than they are – but instead it’s the core BUMMER system… [which] makes me feel judged within an unfair and degrading competition, and to no higher purpose.” Another applicable point appears on page 89: “Suddenly you and other people are being put into a lot of stupid competitions no one asked for.”

While I’m a fan of social media – in fact, you’re most likely reading this article because you saw the link on my Facebook page – I understand that some people take it too far. There are many arguments about social media’s effect on body image and self-esteem, which can lead to comparison misrepresentation, that are issues for teenagers and a main focus of Maddy. But there is another side to all that.

Although some argue that people literally and figuratively filter their posts to make everything look glossy and positive, I value social media because it helps local businesses communicate with consumers without paying insane advertising rates. I also love photos – taking photos and seeing other people’s photos is a lot of fun. That being said, l strongly believe that social media is not a platform for revenge, passive aggressive behavior, or backhanded comments. Unfortunately, there are plenty of people use it for those things which is shame and might be the root of why Lanier wrote this book.

Ending on a high note

Chapter eight is extremely interesting because Lanier points out that social media being free to use has contributed to its popularity. He also comes up with a way to make social media better – pay a low monthly fee to utilize these platforms and if you contribute often through photos or videos, you can earn money. Finally! A solution instead of reading the word BUMMER over and over to an exhausting degree. He adds that allowing people to be paid for the value their data brings to digital platforms will make the world a better place. Bottom line: paying a nominal fee to use social media + the option for users to make money = the author’s best argument. And it’s not one of his top ten.

While Lanier is a clever writer, and clearly well-educated on many subjects pertaining to digital content, he’s also draining and at times comes off as tremendously paranoid. That being said, this will be an interesting book to teach – especially in conjunction with Maddy. Some students might hate it and/or disagree with it but they will have an opinion because all of it pertains to them. They are the generation whose first cell phone was an iPhone. They are also growing up with social media watching their every move. As a result, they may have such intense opinions that they can’t wait to write about it – and sometimes that makes for the best essays.

My favorite (and most relevant) quote appears on the penultimate page of the book and is about learning to write: “You can’t read well until you can write at least a little. The reason we teach writing to students is not in the hopes that they’ll all become professional writers. That would be too cruel. Instead, we hope they’ll learn what it means to write, and to think, which will make them more thoughtful when they read.” See you in September.

Laura

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Blog Archive

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010

Footer

Laura Lieff was named Colorado Mountain College’s 2017-2018 Part Time Staff Member of the Year for her work as a writing tutor and teaching assistant.
Laura Lieff was named Colorado Mountain College’s 2017-2018 Part Time Staff Member of the Year for her work as a writing tutor and teaching assistant.

Work With Me

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
lieff-ink-logo_updated-2
  • About
  • Services
  • Words
  • Blog
  • Client List
  • Contact

Copyright © 2023 · PO Box 1228 Edwards CO 81632 · info@lauralieff.com