• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Lieff Ink

TELL YOUR STORY

  • About
  • Services
    • Writing • Editing
    • PR
    • Writing Tutor
  • Words
  • Press
  • Blog
  • Clients
    • Client List
    • Testimonials
  • Contact
  • Book
    • Accolades
    • Reviews

Carrie Bradshaw Backlash

December 16, 2013

SATCEven though the Sex and the City television series ended in 2004 and the two movies were released back in 2008 and 2010, the women of this show, the fashion, the storylines, their love lives and all the details still resonate with women of all ages and probably always will. It’s rare that I run into a female that doesn’t like SATC or hasn’t seen all the episodes and movies at least once. But for some reason there has been some recent backlash about SATC which I’ve decided to address.

First of all, it’s easy to discriminate and criticize in hindsight – that’s true of anything whether it’s pop culture or not – so I’m wondering why all of the sudden people are now publishing their opinions on the show and specifically the character of Carrie Bradshaw. It can’t just be that TBS and E! rerun episodes constantly.

On May 1, BuzzFeed released an article called “27 Ways You Are Not Carrie Bradshaw” which completely makes fun of the character’s wardrobe, the idea that she could not live the way she does by writing one column a week for a newspaper (so true), the fact that she is high maintenance and impossibly technologically ignorant, how she doesn’t understand how to handle a bank account, her weird catch phrases about love, her inability to get rid of clothes without her friends’ opinions, etc.

While some of these examples are hilarious and true, others are completely unfair and taken out of context. I’m sure the first time people heard the line, “Maybe some women aren’t meant to be tamed. Maybe they need to run free until they find someone just as wild to run with,” it resonated. Now that you’ve seen the episode 97 times, it might come off as dramatic.

On December 4 Elle magazine wrote an article called “How I Learned Carrie Bradshaw Was Full of Sh*t” which discusses how the writer initially thought the women of SATC were exciting and that she had a lot in common with Carrie Bradshaw i.e. they were both writers, a little kooky and were “free spirits who believed in love, not rules.” The she goes on to say that looking back (hindsight), she was very different than the character she admired and realized that Carrie wasn’t cool – instead she was “an idiot, a sucker and a really shitty modern woman.” The Elle writer went on to describe Carrie as “selfish, needy and made millions of women think it’s okay to wear giant flower pins for no reason.” But at the same time, gives the character credit for inspiring her to write publicly and finding her own voice.

People have to remember that Carrie Bradshaw is a character that author Candace Bushnell created and Darren Star, Michael Patrick King and HBO had to write scenes and dialogue for on a weekly basis. While her issues with technology are absurd, the first time you saw them on an episode it made you laugh – which was the point. It was supposed to be funny that she thought Aidan could see her via AOL instant messenger (yeah, the show it that old). And of course no human in the world could afford to buy designer shoes and outfits on a freelance weekly newspaper columnist budget – trust me I know – but that’s not the point. People need to not take these shows and characters so seriously and remember that although SATC is a significant piece of pop culture history, these people aren’t real and the show is meant to entertain.

For those who can’t differentiate between real people who are role models and characters that are flawed but well-written, then they need to get a grip on reality. Not every famous person is meant to be a role model. If they are on TV or in a movie their number one job is to entertain. End of story. Also, people need to remember that when SATC first came out (1998) it was absolutely groundbreaking. No show on television ever talked about sex and “taboo” subjects in such an honest way and no other show made these topics as approachable and fun.

That being said, here are 10 reasons to love and hate the iconic show that is SATC:

Five reasons SATC is annoying:

-Their lifestyles are completely unrealistic and too many people out there believe that if you live in NYC, that’s how your life will be.
-Carrie Bradshaw always puts herself first.
-Although all four women are great in their own ways, they are so different from one another that I have a hard time believing they could all friends.
-Some of the characters are so stereotypical it’s hard to take them seriously.
-Over the years the four women became very affected – obsessed with labels, brands and how things looked on the outside.

Five reasons SATC is great:

-The show broke every rule in the book in terms of sex, what women talk about with each other, what people in general will reveal about themselves, fashion, friendships, love and impressive television writing in general.
-While some episodes are ridiculous and full of moments that have no other value than to shock, other episodes still resonate with me even though I’ve seen them a million times. (I.e. Miranda’s mother’s death, the episode where Carrie and Aidan have their big fight, watching Charlotte have Carrie’s back in the movie when Big doesn’t show up, when Big and Aidan hang out together in the county, the soul mate episode, etc.)
-There are so many funny quotes that can be pulled from some of the episodes and movies – in fact there are a few I use all the time.
-Watching a show that features a writer as the main character is awesome.
-It reminds us that friends are the family we get to choose.

Laura

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Carly Fields says

    December 16, 2013 at 9:39 pm

    As we both know I was one of millions of young women obsessed with the show when it was airing back in the early 2000’s. Years later I too have gained a good bit of perspective on the show that was so much a part of my younger, more impressionable life. Of course the wardrobes were the most amazing thing I have seen, and are probably the most incredible still of any show out there. The fashion became the 5th character for me. I was also inspired by their committed friendships and realistic, albeit racy, conversations about sexuality. It was exactly how I talked to my girlfriends about it. Yes, these were fictional characters but I think it was the very real sexual situations they dealt with and discussed that made us think “well, if we are talking to our girlfriends like this, then we must eventually fill one of these roles in real life.”
    As I got older and watched the syndicated episodes I did start rolling my eyes at the scenarios and drama I once thought were so interesting and groundbreaking. I do think if we analyzed Carrie as a real woman that she is incredibly obnoxious. She is self centered, materialistic, and rarely takes responsibility for her own actions. I would not be able to stand being friends with her.
    Luckily we don’t need to deal with any of them in real life. I think when we were younger we idolized them and what the show stood for for us at that time: ballsy women who dressed like movie stars and did what they wanted in life. But alas, we all grew up and went down our own paths and made our own choices and turned out pretty damn well without following “Life According to SATC.” Now we can just sit back on the couch we bought with our hard earned money with a glass of wine and force the men we met and fell in love with to watch that SATC marathon on E!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Blog Archive

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010

Footer

Laura Lieff was named Colorado Mountain College’s 2017-2018 Part Time Staff Member of the Year for her work as a writing tutor and teaching assistant.
Laura Lieff was named Colorado Mountain College’s 2017-2018 Part Time Staff Member of the Year for her work as a writing tutor and teaching assistant.

Work With Me

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
lieff-ink-logo_updated-2
  • About
  • Services
  • Words
  • Blog
  • Client List
  • Contact

Copyright © 2023 · PO Box 1228 Edwards CO 81632 · info@lauralieff.com